0
votes

Christopher Buckley Leaves National Review: My Take on His Obama Endorsement

posted October 14, 2008 - 9:54pm
Christopher Buckley Leaves National Review: My Take on His Obama Endorsement

After his shocking endorsement of Barack Obama, William F. Buckley's son Christopher has resigned from his position at National Review.

Christopher Buckley had caused a stir this week when he publicly announced his support for...a Democrat! In his blog on The Daily Beast, he argued that McCain was not the man he used to be. He claims that the once authentic McCain had become inauthentic, irascible and gnarly. He also argues that Barack Obama had a "first class temperament."

Christopher Buckley attempted to invoke his father's name to support his arguments. He cites William F. Buckley's desire to "separate the right from the kooks," and points out the elder Buckley's endorsement of Democrats such as Allard Lowenstein and Joe Lieberman.

My Take

Although I plan to vote for McCain, I respect the fact that Christopher Buckley had the courage to speak his mind.

Yet I have to respectfully disagree with Christopher Buckley's position. It's true that today's Republican Party has been hijacked by neocons and religious extremists--even Barry Goldwater spent the end of his life fighting against the religious right.

Still, whatever problems there are in today's Republican party are not enough to sway a vote for Obama. Yes McCain and Palin have been vicious with attacks--but so has the Obama campaign.

Double Standard: McCain and Palin are running a vicious campaign--but how is that different from any other election cycle? Both Bushes were just as tough during their campaigns--the only difference is that their opponents didn't have the messiah following of Obama.

Why is it okay for liberals to call Palin a Nazi, make derogatory comments about McCain's age, engage in sexist smears against Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, undermine McCain's war record and lifetime of service to the country?

Yet when the McCain campaign raises legitimate concerns about Obama's past associations and is critical of his positions, they are decried as racist smear tactics. There is such a double standard. You can't say anything remotely critical about Obama without someone calling you a racist.

William F. Buckley: As for Christopher Buckley's point about his father's endorsement of Lieberman, he neglects one obvious point--Lieberman is a conservative Democrat! Obama is a liberal big-government Democrat (with very socialist leanings).

While Buckley's grievances against the GOP have some merit, that is not enough to justify a (conservative) vote for Obama. The GOP may not be perfect--but that's no reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater.



Comments

What McCain said was fine.

I wrote a blurb about those comments by McCain and added the video clip. I thought what was said showed dignity and class from John McCain in the face of some truly ignorant voters. It was an honest answer which is almost unheard of in politics. (and what did he get for it? boos and jeers..that was sad). Any half-way intelligent person can understand that what he said was not an endorsement, but rather a responsible response to some outrageous comments. Click here to find out how you can get paid to post items like this. It's free and easy to join.

Xombytes

Quote: What he should have

Quote:What he should have said was "Senator Obama is neither an Arab or terrorist," and he could have added the rest. I agree that McCain could have done a better job making that distinction. But I think it was more a slip of the tongue rather than an implication that an Arab cannot be a good family man. McCain and Cindy have done excellent work for human rights in South East Asia. And the fact that they have an adopted black/Asian daughter shows that they are clearly not racist. I'll admit I've been disappointed with McCain recently (and even more so with Palin). But I'm voting on McCain's lifetime record (military service, legislative accomplishments, endorsements from Reagan and Goldwater in 86). Come Nov. 4, I'm voting for him (not her).

If McCain was defending Obama, it was by accident

What he actually said was "no, he is a good and decent family man", which is both not denying that he is an Arab or terrorist and also saying that Arabs cannot be good and decent family men. What he should have said was "Senator Obama is neither an Arab or terrorist," and he could have added the rest. I'm not saying that it's not happening on both sides, particularly in the blogosphere, but the sheer volume coming out of the McCain "Straight Talk" camp is staggering even by today's standards. McCain has become a liability to the Republican Party, as evidenced by the number of Republican candidates for the House who are now seeking to distance themselves. I'm getting closer to making a decision myself, but I have been a registered Republican for the past 22 years and I have been painfully underwhelmed with John McCain as a candidate. Don't even get me started with Sarah Palin. Welcome to Xomba and congratulations on your first comment. DO YOU HAVE THE WRITE STUFF?

Wow my first comment.

Wow my first comment. Yay! You make some valid points. I like Lieberman and was looking forward to voting for a McCain/Lieberman ticket. I like what Lieberman said at the convention. Country before Party. It's true that some McCain supporters and associates have been playing to people's fears with the allegations of terrorism. But that's coming much more from Palin than from McCain. Last week, McCain actually defended Obama when a woman called him an Arab and a terrorist. Still, it's been happening on both sides all season. There have been just as many vicious attacks from the Obama camp. As a McCain supporter, I've taken a lot of hits from Obama supporters. When I try to calmly explain why I have disagreements with his economic policies, I'm called a racist. One point Christopher Buckley made was that his father believed America was ready for a black president. I'll vote for someone of any color--but it has to be the right person.

The campaign

Yes, followers of both candidates have said nasty things. The difference as I see it is that the McCain campaign, mostly Palin, has stoked the fire by accusing Obama of "palling around with terrorists" and in general questioning his patriotism and commitment to the U.S. Also, a number of people associated with McCain... including the people introducing him at rallies... have said such things as Palin (and worse) and for the most part McCain has not tried to challenge or correct them. There's a big difference between a fan or supporter of a candidate making nasty and impolite remarks, and a member of the campaign or people closely associated with it saying such things. I also respect Buckley for his decision, as I do any politician who decides his or her longtime party no longer reflects his values. And that goes for whether that politician is Jim Jeffords (left the Republican party) or Lieberman. I think more politicians should follow their hearts and consciences instead of being slavishly bound to a party just because they happened to have belonged to it for decades.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Join Xomba Today

Do you like to write? Would you like to make a little extra money on the side? These people do. Join the Xomba community today.
Become a Member